This post is inspired and based on my work for that. Comparing Books Here are my three main points on doing a good job.
How These four points interrelate, but let's start with the most important: You can compare any two things—an apple and an aardvark, or a slug and a skyscraper. It's easy to compare things like that: You could fill in the blanks without even thinking.
And that's the problem: That's why so many papers comparing characters are say it softly bad and even worse boring. The writers don't know their purpose for comparison in general or for comparing those two characters in particular.
There are three general purposes for comparing any characters: The more important these are, the more important—and interesting—the comparison. On the other hand, if you compare Ophelia and Hamlet, as two adults following their respective fathers' advice to their deaths, you've demonstrated superior comprehension.
Obviously, purpose 2 and purpose 3 are closely linked. And that brings us to why. Why are you comparing these two specific characters?
You want to examine the two characters and the work they come from until you can complete the following statements: What aspects of these characters are you comparing? Be specific, and always have reasons for your choices. Approach the decision of what to compare methodically. First, look at all the ways that people can be alike or different sex, age, motivation, religion, etc.
Second, look at the many ways characters can be alike or different in literary works: Finally, consider how you will compare the characters. Conceptually, you will have addressed a number of the "how" questions by answering what and why, but you will also want to focus your comparison.
Are you examining how the characters speak for themselves—or how other characters respond to them? How they see the world—or how the work's conclusion passes judgment on their perspectives? As individuals—or as representatives of their class, race, family, region?"the Necklace" a Closer Look at the Characters Essay "the Necklace" a Closer Look at the Characters and over other 29,+ free term papers, are characters that are not well developed and remain fairly unchanged throughout the story.
Usually static characters have minor roles in a story. Similar Essays. Courage & Character Education. Cisneros showed a unique style in her book The House on Mango Street.
This book is about a Chicana girl trying to find her identity and her home. She is trying to find a place in society and feel comfortable with her new environment as well as her new home.
Cisneros shows how Esperanza is a unique character in a way that she is very similar to the . These four points interrelate, but let's start with the most important: the purposes of comparison.
You can compare any two things—an apple and an aardvark, or a slug and a skyscraper. It's easy. Over the course of the Grade 10 year, I had the wonderful opportunity to read a few texts, including plays, poems and books.
These readings included two very interesting novels/plays, “The Help” and “Macbeth”, that each had different plots, but many similar characters. Writing a Character Analysis Essay. Think about your overall impressions of your character. Choose three traits that your character exhibits throughout the story and create an essay that explains HOW you know these are his/her traits and WHY they are significant to the story (how they complicate the action or how they interact with other.
The story is told by Guy Montag, a fireman who burns books for a living. Ray Bradbury's ability to create psychologically complex and ambiguous characters like Guy Montag enabled science fiction to be taken seriously in the literary world.