Four Problems and New Philosophical Perspectives Masaki Ichinose The University of Tokyo Abstract This paper aims at bringing a new philosophical perspective to the current debate on the death penalty through a discussion of peculiar kinds of uncertainties that surround the death penalty. I focus on laying out the philosophical argument, with the aim of stimulating and restructuring the death penalty debate.
The Death Penalty Today: National Press Club Washington, D. Since the Supreme Court lifted its moratorium on the death penalty 30 years ago, 38 states and the federal government have reinstated capital punishment.
In recent years, there has been a nationwide debate over the proper application, morality and constitutionality of the death penalty. Some argue that there are systemic flaws in its application and that those on death row are disproportionately poor, mentally ill or African-American.
Abolitionists claim that if the death penalty can not be applied justly in all cases, it should not exist at all. Those in the pro-death penalty camp claim that abolitionists ignore the individual circumstances of each case and that some crimes are so heinous that the only appropriate punishment is death.
Furthermore, they argue that the existence of the death penalty deters violent crime. The Pew Forum, together with the Federalist Society and the Constitution Projectheld an event examining the application, morality and constitutionality of the death penalty in the United States, focusing on issues such as habeas corpus review, clemency, the Eighth Amendment and adequate defendant representation.
Department of Justice, Washington, D. The Constitution Project is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization that conducts public education and research on controversial constitutional law and governance issues.
These issues include our system of checks and balances, the balance between liberty and security after Sept. The Federalist Society is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in law and public policy. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom and that it is the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be.
The Society seeks to promote an awareness of these principles and to further them through its activities. The Pew Forum is part of the Pew Research Center and its mission is to provide timely information on important issues at the intersection of religion and public affairs.
The Forum is nonpartisan in nature and does not take positions on any topics.
Though neither the Pew Forum nor the Federalist Society takes positions on policy issues, the Constitution Project does through our bipartisan committees of distinguished and expert Americans. We have available for you out front our consensus recommendations for reforms issued by our Death Penalty Initiative, which consists of both supporters and opponents of capital punishment, all of whom believe that the system is badly broken and that the risk of convicting and even executing the wrong people is too great.
The death penalty is certainly a hotly contested issue, and in recent years Americans have witnessed a parade of exonerated individuals, including who were sentenced to death. The number of death sentences is down, as is the number of actual executions. Support for the death penalty has decreased as Americans grow increasingly aware that the criminal justice system makes mistakes and that not only have innocent people been convicted of crimes, but in a continuing tragedy the true perpetrators have remained free to commit more crimes.
Our panelists today represent a fascinating array of views on this topic.The Death Penalty Debate: Four Problems and New Philosophical Perspectives.
Masaki Ichinose. The University of Tokyo. Abstract. This paper aims at bringing a new philosophical perspective to the current debate on the death penalty through a discussion of peculiar kinds of uncertainties that surround the death penalty.
This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue. I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the.
DEATH PENALTY AND SENTENCING INFORMATION In the United States 10/1/97 By Dudley Sharp, Death Penalty Resources Director, Justice For All The death penalty debate in the U.S. is dominated by the fraudulent voice of the anti-death penalty movement.
The Term Paper on Death Penalty Juveniles Crime Deterrent supporting the death penalty are flawed when applying them to juveniles.
The debate over whether or not the death penalty is an effective deterrent is likely. Debate against death penalty essaysThe death penalty has always been a very controversial issue. Death sentences are usually handed out to people who have been found guilty of capital crime.
However it is not so easy to consider death penalty as an easy way to punish the guilty. If the death pena. You can order a custom essay, research paper, term paper, thesis or dissertation on Death Penalty topics from our professional custom writing service which provides .